Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Re: [BLUG] I don't think Linux will ever be ready for the Desktop

›
Okay guys, I think I might look into Debian, perhaps seeing what I can do with a live CD or perhaps prepping a new partition with gparted ...

Re: [BLUG] I don't think Linux will ever be ready for the Desktop

›
I went off on Debian users who use unstable instead of stable (or testing) hurting Debian development during a job interview once... only to...

Re: [BLUG] I don't think Linux will ever be ready for the Desktop

›
On 5 May 2010 19:50, Steven Black < yam655@gmail.com > wrote: > You are correct. I was confusing the new Debian 2 year release cycl...

Re: [BLUG] I don't think Linux will ever be ready for the Desktop

›
You are correct. I was confusing the new Debian 2 year release cycle < http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090729 > with KDE's new 6...

Re: [BLUG] I don't think Linux will ever be ready for the Desktop

›
Steven Black wrote: > Debian is not a conservative OS. In the past they always rolled the > security updates in to the stable branch, ...

Re: [BLUG] I don't think Linux will ever be ready for the Desktop

›
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Joe Auty < joe@netmusician.org > wrote: > > Sure OS X has its share of bugs, but can you in anyw...

Re: [BLUG] I don't think Linux will ever be ready for the Desktop

›
I think almost everyone has seen those types of major regressions with Windows. One key in keeping that beast running is being conservative ...