Was curious if anyone else had run into att provided dsl modem acting as a firewall and blocking all ports on them?
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Re: [BLUG] looking for (linux friendly) offsite backup options
Ben Shewmaker <ben@shewbox.org> wrote:
> Does anyone have any recommendations on offsite backup options? I
> Does anyone have any recommendations on offsite backup options? I
Here's another: https://spideroak.com/
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Monday, April 25, 2011
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
Also most custom roms include usb tethering as well
On Apr 25, 2011 4:01 PM, "Simón Ruiz" <simon.a.ruiz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Lord Drachenblut
> <lord.drachenblut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This isn't strictly a carrier issue.
>>
>> In the case of the captivate on att samsung wants to charge att for updates
>> for that phone.
>>
>> In the case of htc phones because of sense ui they have to rebuild the
>> system with every update
>
> If you're willing to jailbreak your phone anyhow, it's worth
> mentioning that with Android phones there are usually other firmware
> options which tend to give you more freedom and features (like wifi
> tethering) than the stock firmware.
>
> You're not usually bound to the phone manufacturer or carrier's idea
> of what your software must look/behave like.
>
> Of the four people I know with Heros (including myself), I'm the only
> one not running Cyanogen Mod.
>
> Simón
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@linuxfan.com
> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Lord Drachenblut
> <lord.drachenblut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This isn't strictly a carrier issue.
>>
>> In the case of the captivate on att samsung wants to charge att for updates
>> for that phone.
>>
>> In the case of htc phones because of sense ui they have to rebuild the
>> system with every update
>
> If you're willing to jailbreak your phone anyhow, it's worth
> mentioning that with Android phones there are usually other firmware
> options which tend to give you more freedom and features (like wifi
> tethering) than the stock firmware.
>
> You're not usually bound to the phone manufacturer or carrier's idea
> of what your software must look/behave like.
>
> Of the four people I know with Heros (including myself), I'm the only
> one not running Cyanogen Mod.
>
> Simón
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@linuxfan.com
> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Lord Drachenblut
<lord.drachenblut@gmail.com> wrote:
> This isn't strictly a carrier issue.
>
> In the case of the captivate on att samsung wants to charge att for updates
> for that phone.
>
> In the case of htc phones because of sense ui they have to rebuild the
> system with every update
<lord.drachenblut@gmail.com> wrote:
> This isn't strictly a carrier issue.
>
> In the case of the captivate on att samsung wants to charge att for updates
> for that phone.
>
> In the case of htc phones because of sense ui they have to rebuild the
> system with every update
If you're willing to jailbreak your phone anyhow, it's worth
mentioning that with Android phones there are usually other firmware
options which tend to give you more freedom and features (like wifi
tethering) than the stock firmware.
You're not usually bound to the phone manufacturer or carrier's idea
of what your software must look/behave like.
Of the four people I know with Heros (including myself), I'm the only
one not running Cyanogen Mod.
Simón
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
This isn't strictly a carrier issue.
In the case of the captivate on att samsung wants to charge att for updates for that phone.
In the case of htc phones because of sense ui they have to rebuild the system with every update
On Apr 24, 2011 1:02 PM, "Joe Auty" <joe@netmusician.org> wrote:
> My major (and unrelated) wish is for carriers to stop jerking around
> with holding back OS updates. The single-most useful feature to me is
> tethering, and I absolutely resent paying extra for this while having
> the same data plan (which is not something universal among all
> carriers), so I went and bought an iPhone, jail broke it, and installed
> MyWi on it rather than setup tethering for an Android phone. I was
> concerned that if I bought a particular phone that within a period of
> time AT&T/Verizon would pull the plug on that phone and I'd be stuck
> with the version I have. I don't need the latest and greatest, but I
> didn't want to be paying the same price and locked into a phone that may
> be lacking nifty features available in future versions, or stuck with an
> OS version that is not widely supported anymore.
>
> As much as I recognize the risk of relying on jail breaks to use
> tethering with my iPhone, I do appreciate the whole concept of a single
> OS version that is available for all versions of the iPhone for as long
> as the hardware is supported (and my second generation iPod Touch ran
> the latest iOS version, so it seems like Apple is done a fairly good job
> at supporting older gear). Technically speaking, I believe that the AT&T
> and Verizon iPhone versions are different right now, but as far as user
> features and overall experience go the two versions are identical, and
> if Apple hasn't already done so I'm sure they will consolidate on a
> single version.
>
> One other rationale I had (flawed or not) was that since I'm not much of
> a phone person I just wanted something that just worked without having
> to tinker (please let me know if this assumption on my part was stupid
> so I'll know for next time :). Finally, because I'm doing web
> development for these devices I figured not relying on the simulator to
> get a feel for the entire experience would be smart. At some point I'll
> have to look into setting up the Android simulator.
>
>
>
>
>> Simón Ruiz <mailto:simon.a.ruiz@gmail.com>
>> April 20, 2011 10:10 PM
>>
>>
>> HTTP proxy settings for the WiFi interface.
>>
>> It really sucks that I can set up our students and faculty with iOS
>> devices to get out to the Internet through our proxy, but not the
>> Android users.
>>
>> Anyone know of a good apk that might give me HTTP proxy functionality
>> on Android?
>>
>> If I could at least offer them an app to install, that'd be *something*.
>>
>> Simón
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BLUG mailing list
>> BLUG@linuxfan.com
>> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> Joe Auty, NetMusician
> NetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
> professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy
> to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks.
> www.netmusician.org <http://www.netmusician.org>
> joe@netmusician.org <mailto:joe@netmusician.org>
>
> My major (and unrelated) wish is for carriers to stop jerking around
> with holding back OS updates. The single-most useful feature to me is
> tethering, and I absolutely resent paying extra for this while having
> the same data plan (which is not something universal among all
> carriers), so I went and bought an iPhone, jail broke it, and installed
> MyWi on it rather than setup tethering for an Android phone. I was
> concerned that if I bought a particular phone that within a period of
> time AT&T/Verizon would pull the plug on that phone and I'd be stuck
> with the version I have. I don't need the latest and greatest, but I
> didn't want to be paying the same price and locked into a phone that may
> be lacking nifty features available in future versions, or stuck with an
> OS version that is not widely supported anymore.
>
> As much as I recognize the risk of relying on jail breaks to use
> tethering with my iPhone, I do appreciate the whole concept of a single
> OS version that is available for all versions of the iPhone for as long
> as the hardware is supported (and my second generation iPod Touch ran
> the latest iOS version, so it seems like Apple is done a fairly good job
> at supporting older gear). Technically speaking, I believe that the AT&T
> and Verizon iPhone versions are different right now, but as far as user
> features and overall experience go the two versions are identical, and
> if Apple hasn't already done so I'm sure they will consolidate on a
> single version.
>
> One other rationale I had (flawed or not) was that since I'm not much of
> a phone person I just wanted something that just worked without having
> to tinker (please let me know if this assumption on my part was stupid
> so I'll know for next time :). Finally, because I'm doing web
> development for these devices I figured not relying on the simulator to
> get a feel for the entire experience would be smart. At some point I'll
> have to look into setting up the Android simulator.
>
>
>
>
>> Simón Ruiz <mailto:simon.a.ruiz@gmail.com>
>> April 20, 2011 10:10 PM
>>
>>
>> HTTP proxy settings for the WiFi interface.
>>
>> It really sucks that I can set up our students and faculty with iOS
>> devices to get out to the Internet through our proxy, but not the
>> Android users.
>>
>> Anyone know of a good apk that might give me HTTP proxy functionality
>> on Android?
>>
>> If I could at least offer them an app to install, that'd be *something*.
>>
>> Simón
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BLUG mailing list
>> BLUG@linuxfan.com
>> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> Joe Auty, NetMusician
> NetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
> professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy
> to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks.
> www.netmusician.org <http://www.netmusician.org>
> joe@netmusician.org <mailto:joe@netmusician.org>
>
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
My major (and unrelated) wish is for carriers to stop jerking around with holding back OS updates. The single-most useful feature to me is tethering, and I absolutely resent paying extra for this while having the same data plan (which is not something universal among all carriers), so I went and bought an iPhone, jail broke it, and installed MyWi on it rather than setup tethering for an Android phone. I was concerned that if I bought a particular phone that within a period of time AT&T/Verizon would pull the plug on that phone and I'd be stuck with the version I have. I don't need the latest and greatest, but I didn't want to be paying the same price and locked into a phone that may be lacking nifty features available in future versions, or stuck with an OS version that is not widely supported anymore.
As much as I recognize the risk of relying on jail breaks to use tethering with my iPhone, I do appreciate the whole concept of a single OS version that is available for all versions of the iPhone for as long as the hardware is supported (and my second generation iPod Touch ran the latest iOS version, so it seems like Apple is done a fairly good job at supporting older gear). Technically speaking, I believe that the AT&T and Verizon iPhone versions are different right now, but as far as user features and overall experience go the two versions are identical, and if Apple hasn't already done so I'm sure they will consolidate on a single version.
One other rationale I had (flawed or not) was that since I'm not much of a phone person I just wanted something that just worked without having to tinker (please let me know if this assumption on my part was stupid so I'll know for next time :). Finally, because I'm doing web development for these devices I figured not relying on the simulator to get a feel for the entire experience would be smart. At some point I'll have to look into setting up the Android simulator.
As much as I recognize the risk of relying on jail breaks to use tethering with my iPhone, I do appreciate the whole concept of a single OS version that is available for all versions of the iPhone for as long as the hardware is supported (and my second generation iPod Touch ran the latest iOS version, so it seems like Apple is done a fairly good job at supporting older gear). Technically speaking, I believe that the AT&T and Verizon iPhone versions are different right now, but as far as user features and overall experience go the two versions are identical, and if Apple hasn't already done so I'm sure they will consolidate on a single version.
One other rationale I had (flawed or not) was that since I'm not much of a phone person I just wanted something that just worked without having to tinker (please let me know if this assumption on my part was stupid so I'll know for next time :). Finally, because I'm doing web development for these devices I figured not relying on the simulator to get a feel for the entire experience would be smart. At some point I'll have to look into setting up the Android simulator.
Simón Ruiz
April 20, 2011 10:10 PM
HTTP proxy settings for the WiFi interface.
It really sucks that I can set up our students and faculty with iOS devices to get out to the Internet through our proxy, but not the Android users.
Anyone know of a good apk that might give me HTTP proxy functionality on Android?
If I could at least offer them an app to install, that'd be *something*.
Simón
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful, professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks.
www.netmusician.org
joe@netmusician.org
Joe Auty, NetMusician
www.netmusician.org
joe@netmusician.org
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
Huh, looks like another case where Android behaves differently on
certain devices.
certain devices.
I've got a Nexus One running stock Android that has always connected
automatically to IU Secure. This has been the case on both 2.2 and
2.3.
Josh
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Chris Shelton <cshelton@indiana.edu> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 at 1:08pm, Andrew Dabrowski wrote:
>
>> As someone who is toying with the idea of getting an Android phone
>> and/or tablet, I'd appreciate it if you would explain the problem
>> more precisely. Does this mean Android users can't use IU's wifi
>> system? Is this only an issue with phones, or tablets too?
>
> Regarding accessing IU secure with an android phone, it works with
> only minor tweaking and is documenting here:
> http://kb.iu.edu/data/azle.html
>
> I have an LG optimus T running android 2.2, and it connects without
> problems to IU secure. The only minor nit is that it doesn't
> automatically connect; I have to tell the phone to connect to IU
> secure. The phone connects to my home wireless network automatically.
>
> chris
>
> --
> Chris Shelton
> Indiana University - Financial Management Services
> -
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@linuxfan.com
> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
Andrew,
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 at 1:08pm, Andrew Dabrowski wrote:
> As someone who is toying with the idea of getting an Android phone
> and/or tablet, I'd appreciate it if you would explain the problem
> more precisely. Does this mean Android users can't use IU's wifi
> system? Is this only an issue with phones, or tablets too?
Regarding accessing IU secure with an android phone, it works with
only minor tweaking and is documenting here:
http://kb.iu.edu/data/azle.html
I have an LG optimus T running android 2.2, and it connects without
problems to IU secure. The only minor nit is that it doesn't
automatically connect; I have to tell the phone to connect to IU
secure. The phone connects to my home wireless network automatically.
chris
--
Chris Shelton
Indiana University - Financial Management Services
-
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Andrew Dabrowski <dabrowsa@indiana.edu> wrote:
> As someone who is toying with the idea of getting an Android phone and/or
> tablet, I'd appreciate it if you would explain the problem more precisely.
> Does this mean Android users can't use IU's wifi system? Is this only an
> issue with phones, or tablets too?
> As someone who is toying with the idea of getting an Android phone and/or
> tablet, I'd appreciate it if you would explain the problem more precisely.
> Does this mean Android users can't use IU's wifi system? Is this only an
> issue with phones, or tablets too?
You'll need more local help on that, as I'm in Fort Wayne these days
and had no idea how IU's WiFi system worked, even when I live in
Bloomington.
My problem is that we don't allow Internet access except through our
proxy, which does content filtering and caching.
There does not seem to be a way to set most stock Android images to
use a proxy, including my HTC Hero, the HTC Droid Incredible, and my
new Motorola Xoom.
If you're comfortable rooting and/or re-flashing your device, it seems
there are apps on the market that will do the job and/or most
community versions of Android have the setting available by default.
That's my read of the situation, anyhow.
Simón
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
begin:vcard
fn:Andrew Dabrowski
n:Dabrowski;Andrew
email;internet:dabrowsa@indiana.edu
tel;work:812 855-5470
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
As someone who is toying with the idea of getting an Android phone
and/or tablet, I'd appreciate it if you would explain the problem more
precisely. Does this mean Android users can't use IU's wifi system? Is
this only an issue with phones, or tablets too?
fn:Andrew Dabrowski
n:Dabrowski;Andrew
email;internet:dabrowsa@indiana.edu
tel;work:812 855-5470
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
As someone who is toying with the idea of getting an Android phone
and/or tablet, I'd appreciate it if you would explain the problem more
precisely. Does this mean Android users can't use IU's wifi system? Is
this only an issue with phones, or tablets too?
Friday, April 22, 2011
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Lord Drachenblut
<lord.drachenblut@gmail.com> wrote:
> this isn't actually android's fault to be honest. After a little digging
> proxy is availble in most 3rd party roms it seems and even in aosp. This
> seems to be a issue of the handset manufacters leaving out the functionality
>
> --
> Matthew Williams
<lord.drachenblut@gmail.com> wrote:
> this isn't actually android's fault to be honest. After a little digging
> proxy is availble in most 3rd party roms it seems and even in aosp. This
> seems to be a issue of the handset manufacters leaving out the functionality
>
> --
> Matthew Williams
True to some extent. This is why I kind of hoped a third party apk
would do the trick.
It was my understanding that the Xoom is running vanilla Android 3.0,
though. There's no obviously Motorola software except for the logo
that comes up immediately when you turn it on.
Simón
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
On Thursday 21 April 2011 10:59:30 AM Simón Ruiz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Williams, Jeffery Allen
>
> <jefjewil@indiana.edu> wrote:
> > There are a couple of applications that will setup a proxy server ASProxy
> > in the market and Transparent Proxy in other places. Unfortunately they
> > require root access on the phone. I'm not sure everyone is up to this.
> > I also vaguely remember this being brought up as part of a future
> > version of Android.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jeffery Williams
> >
> > Software Engineer
> >
> > ISAT Hall
>
> Yeah, that's been my experience.
>
> The free ones I've used either don't seem to work on the devices I
> tried them on, which makes me not too enthusiastic about them, or
> require root. And I can't expect all my users to have root, or to want
> to root their phones.
>
> I also don't want to point them to pay apps for simple functionality I
> used to think of as mostly universal.
>
> I mean, I can set up all kinds of other crappy little embedded systems
> to work right on our network, any PC you can throw at me, and most
> handheld devices (including iOS)...but not my Android phone or tablet.
>
> That just kind of hurts.
>
> Simón
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@linuxfan.com
> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Williams, Jeffery Allen
>
> <jefjewil@indiana.edu> wrote:
> > There are a couple of applications that will setup a proxy server ASProxy
> > in the market and Transparent Proxy in other places. Unfortunately they
> > require root access on the phone. I'm not sure everyone is up to this.
> > I also vaguely remember this being brought up as part of a future
> > version of Android.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jeffery Williams
> >
> > Software Engineer
> >
> > ISAT Hall
>
> Yeah, that's been my experience.
>
> The free ones I've used either don't seem to work on the devices I
> tried them on, which makes me not too enthusiastic about them, or
> require root. And I can't expect all my users to have root, or to want
> to root their phones.
>
> I also don't want to point them to pay apps for simple functionality I
> used to think of as mostly universal.
>
> I mean, I can set up all kinds of other crappy little embedded systems
> to work right on our network, any PC you can throw at me, and most
> handheld devices (including iOS)...but not my Android phone or tablet.
>
> That just kind of hurts.
>
> Simón
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@linuxfan.com
> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
this isn't actually android's fault to be honest. After a little digging
proxy is availble in most 3rd party roms it seems and even in aosp. This
seems to be a issue of the handset manufacters leaving out the functionality
--
Matthew Williams
President Indiana F/oss Society
Organizer of Indiana Linuxfest http://indianalinux.org
PGP e-mail is welcome! Get my 1024 bit signature key from:
<http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x00D1EABB>
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Williams, Jeffery Allen
<jefjewil@indiana.edu> wrote:
> There are a couple of applications that will setup a proxy server ASProxy in
> the market and Transparent Proxy in other places. Unfortunately they
> require root access on the phone. I'm not sure everyone is up to this. I
> also vaguely remember this being brought up as part of a future version of
> Android.
>
>
>
> Jeffery Williams
>
> Software Engineer
>
> ISAT Hall
<jefjewil@indiana.edu> wrote:
> There are a couple of applications that will setup a proxy server ASProxy in
> the market and Transparent Proxy in other places. Unfortunately they
> require root access on the phone. I'm not sure everyone is up to this. I
> also vaguely remember this being brought up as part of a future version of
> Android.
>
>
>
> Jeffery Williams
>
> Software Engineer
>
> ISAT Hall
Yeah, that's been my experience.
The free ones I've used either don't seem to work on the devices I
tried them on, which makes me not too enthusiastic about them, or
require root. And I can't expect all my users to have root, or to want
to root their phones.
I also don't want to point them to pay apps for simple functionality I
used to think of as mostly universal.
I mean, I can set up all kinds of other crappy little embedded systems
to work right on our network, any PC you can throw at me, and most
handheld devices (including iOS)...but not my Android phone or tablet.
That just kind of hurts.
Simón
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Re: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
There are a couple of applications that will setup a proxy server ASProxy in the market and Transparent Proxy in other places. Unfortunately they require root access on the phone. I’m not sure everyone is up to this. I also vaguely remember this being brought up as part of a future version of Android.
Jeffery Williams
Software Engineer
ISAT Hall
From: blug-bounces@cs.indiana.edu [mailto:blug-bounces@cs.indiana.edu] On Behalf Of Simón Ruiz
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:11 PM
To: Fort Wayne Linux Users Group; Bloomington LINUX Users Group
Subject: [BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
HTTP proxy settings for the WiFi interface.
It really sucks that I can set up our students and faculty with iOS devices to get out to the Internet through our proxy, but not the Android users.
Anyone know of a good apk that might give me HTTP proxy functionality on Android?
If I could at least offer them an app to install, that'd be *something*.
Simón
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
[BLUG] Simple wish list for Android
HTTP proxy settings for the WiFi interface.
It really sucks that I can set up our students and faculty with iOS devices to get out to the Internet through our proxy, but not the Android users.
Anyone know of a good apk that might give me HTTP proxy functionality on Android?
If I could at least offer them an app to install, that'd be *something*.
Simón
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Re: [BLUG] Evolution and IU's Exchange servers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hash: SHA1
I have been using Microsoft Exchange Data Provider with mixed success:
http://gitorious.org/lightning-exchange-provider/pages/Home
There are many caveats: you must use .11 and not .12 or you seem to get
locked out in AD. Your passphrase will not get saved in the password
manager...if you sausage-finger the passphrase, you will get locked out
in AD.
You could also try the davmail gateway, but I have not played with it in
some time...issues with repeating events and ghost events:
http://davmail.sourceforge.net/index.html
I would love to endorse any of these, but they are NOT READY FOR PUBLIC
USE in IU's Exchange environment. I have put the occasional bug report
in, but other tasks slowed that down for me.
Essentially, you still occasionally need OWA or the Outlook client.
Robert
On 03/31/2011 02:39 PM, Steven Black wrote:
> Personally, if the web version doesn't work (it has gotten better --
> the current version doesn't use a "Lite" version in Firefox) then your
> best bet is to use RDP to a Windows machine or a Windows VM. Since you
> only really need it for creating meetings, you don't need the VM
> consuming resources most of the time.
>
> The problem with a Windows VM is that it is almost impossible to get
> anything other than XP to run without assigning most of your resources
> to the VM. (And Windows XP is a bit on the old side, so may not be
> available with security updates anymore.)
>
> I actually had more luck with RDP than with a VM.
>
> Cheers,
> Steven Black
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Kelly McEvilly <kellym@wbhcp.com> wrote:
>> I used the same Thunderbird/Lightning setup with my Zimbra mail server and
>> it worked flawlessly for all calendaring functions. Zimbra has their own
>> mail client which I use now.
>>
>> The Zimbra Ajax web client also works perfectly for any type of
>> calendaring. I believe even the HTML client gives access to all
>> calendaring.
>>
>> I swear I'm not bringing this up just to rub salt in the wounds of all the
>> MS Exchange slaves...
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chris Colvard" <cjcolvar@indiana.edu>
>> To: blug@cs.indiana.edu
>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 12:32:11 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: [BLUG] Evolution and IU's Exchange servers
>>
>> I've used Thunderbird and the Lightning plugin to add meeting requests to my
>> local or google calendar. Over time this has proven to be rather flaky, but
>> has sort of worked. I was not able to create any meetings in the Exchange
>> server though.
>>
>> -Chris Colvard
>>
>>
>> On 03/31/2011 12:17 PM, Williams, Jeffery Allen wrote:
>>
>> Is the web version of exchange unreasonable? <www.exchange.iu.edu>
>> I never found a good solution. My work is so MS centric, I ended up making a
>> winXP virtual machine.
>> Jeffery Williams
>> Software Engineer
>> IU Cyclotron Operations
>> --
>> Warning! Sent from my Android phone.
>>
>> Brian Wheeler <bdwheele@indiana.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Has anyone gotten this to work, for calendaring in particular?
>>>
>>> I'm using imap to access mail on the exchange servers, but I really need
>>> to get calendaring. Barring that, does anyone have a reasonable way
>>> (outlook in a vm isn't reasonable) to deal with exchange calendaring?
>>>
>>> Brian
>>> ________________________________
>>> BLUG mailing list
>>> BLUG@linuxfan.com
>>> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BLUG mailing list
>> BLUG@linuxfan.com
>> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ BLUG mailing list
>> BLUG@linuxfan.com http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>> _______________________________________________
>> BLUG mailing list
>> BLUG@linuxfan.com
>> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@linuxfan.com
> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
- --
________
Robert Freeman-Day
https://launchpad.net/~presgas
GPG Public Key:
http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBA9DF9ED3E4C7D36
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2cvEIACgkQup357T5MfTY71wCgqoTNbWuWrbt+0pb1cqiEYJt0
1mAAnjY3B4GTrUkj2+z6glWFSkhgS4Cu
=sMxh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
[BLUG] [SPAM:### 82%] Hi!!!
T my friends,i'm never one to recommend a product unless its really
something phenomenal but I have been using this stuff that my doc
recommended for fat loss and I have lost 8 lbs in a week. Two of my
friends who just began using it also lost 7 lbs each.
http://poweredslim.com p.s. that site sells it for 50% less as much as
other sites
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
something phenomenal but I have been using this stuff that my doc
recommended for fat loss and I have lost 8 lbs in a week. Two of my
friends who just began using it also lost 7 lbs each.
http://poweredslim.com p.s. that site sells it for 50% less as much as
other sites
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
[BLUG] [SPAM:### 82%] Hi!!!
T my friends,i'm never one to recommend a product unless its really
something phenomenal but I have been using this stuff that my doc
recommended for fat loss and I have lost 8 lbs in a week. Two of my
friends who just began using it also lost 7 lbs each.
http://poweredslim.com p.s. that site sells it for 50% less as much as
other sites
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
something phenomenal but I have been using this stuff that my doc
recommended for fat loss and I have lost 8 lbs in a week. Two of my
friends who just began using it also lost 7 lbs each.
http://poweredslim.com p.s. that site sells it for 50% less as much as
other sites
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
Monday, April 4, 2011
Re: [BLUG] Matthew Williams wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn
I'm sorry for this everyone. I forgot to uncheck a few emails when sending out invitations
On Apr 4, 2011 6:59 PM, "Matthew Williams" <lord.drachenblut@gmail.com> wrote:
[BLUG] Matthew Williams wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn
| I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
© 2011, LinkedIn Corporation 
[BLUG] Matthew Williams wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn
|
