Friday, February 13, 2009

[SPAM:### 82%] Re: [BLUG] [SPAM:### 85%] unix time 1234567890

Oh man I'm glad I read this just in time. I almost missed it.

Quoting Jonathan North Washington <jonwashi@indiana.edu>:

> http://www.1234567890day.com/
>
> --
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@linuxfan.com
> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>

_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug

[SPAM:### 82%] Re: [BLUG] [SPAM:### 85%] unix time 1234567890

Oh is that finally here. For those of you who scoff at the idea that
Unix epoch time could have meaning, might not know when 1,000,000,000
unix epoch seconds happened. Sept. 9th, 2001.

And on 500,000,000 unix epoch seconds..... actually nothing happened. j/k


On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:36:44PM GMT, Jonathan North Washington [jonwashi@indiana.edu] said the following:
> http://www.1234567890day.com/
>
> --
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@linuxfan.com
> http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug
>

--
Mark Krenz
Bloomington Linux Users Group
http://www.bloomingtonlinux.org/
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug

[BLUG] [SPAM:### 85%] unix time 1234567890

http://www.1234567890day.com/

--
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug