Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Re: [BLUG] Fwd: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:46:33 -0500, J Apple Muncy <jmuncy@cs.iusb.edu>
wrote:

> I say, how me the code that proves this..

The email would have been more effective if specific commits to the system
were targeted, rather than just naming names.

Aaron Hsu

--
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug

Re: [BLUG] Fwd: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:46:47 -0500, Jeremy L. Gaddis <jlgaddis@gnu.org>
wrote:

> i am (personally) inclined to believe it's a bunch of bs.

I eagerly await the results of the audit, but I also remain skeptical.

Aaron Hsu

--
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug

Re: [BLUG] Fwd: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:16:14 -0500, Mark Krenz <mark@slugbug.org> wrote:

> Just curious, does anyone on the list use OpenBSD? I know some of you
> use FreeBSD. What I'm worried about is if there are also backdoors in
> OpenSSH.

I use it, or at least, I try to use it when I can. I am not familiar with
the efforts mentioned in this email, but the way to find out whether it
affects OpenSSH is to see the commits that are in question on the VCS.
There is a web interface to it, but you may be more comfortable and more
efficient using the normal CVS tools that are available.

Aaron Hsu

--
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug