Thursday, July 2, 2009

Re: [BLUG] SSH nested tunnels

On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Mark Krenz wrote:

> I'm fine, just a geek. I eventually went on and created
> tunnels 100 levels deep (in a automated fashion of course).
> At 100 levels deep, 1 character generated nearly 100MB of data
> and my CPU would go up to 90%+.

Very Dumb Question : what makes nested tunnels worth such
an expense? Are they way more secure? Had somebody said it
couldn't be done? Or what?

--
Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is.


_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug

No comments: