Sunday, September 2, 2007

Re: [BLUG] VMWare Workstation and full virtualization

On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 04:02:02PM GMT, Shing-Shong Shei [shei@cs.indiana.edu] said the following:
> Mark ,
>
> Thanks for the information. I have some questions though:
>
> 1) Does the P4 you use support VT?

No. AFAIK, none of the P4s support VT. The newer Pentium D chips have
VT support.

> 2) Are the VMs you created multi-CPU running SMP OS? If not,
> any chance you can repeat your experiment using SMP (by
> keeping the total number of virtual CPUs the same? I.e.,
> if it was 8 1-CPU VMs, then use 4 2-CPU VMs). I assume
> that your POVRay benchmarks utilize pthreads?

When I did the testing, it was with on a single Pentium 4 with
hyperthreading turned off. So it should have been a good base test.
Plus, the test I did wasn't quite up to standards, it was only so I
could make conclusions for my own use. If I get a chance, I'll do the
test with multiple CPUs.

I've heard that using an SMP kernel is actually faster even if you
only have 1 CPU. Kinda strange.


> 3) Have you actually performed the bench marks on multi-core?
> Intel? AMD? Specifically I am interested in the data when
> running multi VMs on multi-core to see when the shared bus
> on Intel will max out. My guess is that AMD should fare
> better.

Yeah, that would be interesting. I only really have my workstation at
home to do that test with though.


--
Mark Krenz
Bloomington Linux Users Group
http://www.bloomingtonlinux.org/
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug

No comments: