Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Re: [BLUG] Xen is stable

Mark Krenz wrote:
> If anyone needs a testiment that Xen is stable, here it is:
>
> # uptime
> 05:33:15 up 509 days, 7:45, 4 users, load average: 0.06, 0.23, 0.11
>
> That's the uptime for the Xen host machine, the virtual machines have
> been running for a while too, but some of them have been rebooted for
> various reasons. That's on a machine that is running about 6 virtual
> machines that are running webservers, mail servers, databases, etc. I
> also have another Xen host running about 14 VMs that has been up for 419
> days. Unfortunately I had to reboot both servers over the weekend for
> hardware upgrades.
>
>
>


In my experience, Xen is stable, but only if it gets along with its host
and guest OS. Certain combinations just do not play nicely with Xen, at
least according to my own personal experience.

When you guys create VM servers, do you separate your user data from
your OS/application data by putting these on separate (virtual) disks? I
like to do this so that my VM image is as small as possible and easy to
replicate without having to manually delete irrelevant user data, but I
know that simply cloning physical hardware into a VM is a popular
approach to bringing up VMs as well...


--
Joe Auty
NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians
http://www.netmusician.org
joe@netmusician.org
_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@linuxfan.com
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/mailman/listinfo/blug

No comments: