Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Re: [BLUG] Xfinity, Ubuntu woes

I have an X201 as well but it runs Windows 8.1. When I first updated it
to Windows 8.1, I also ran into this weird problem that sometimes the
wireless connection stopped working after waking up form suspend or
hibernation. The following solution seems to help (and judging from your
reply, it might related to this problem. Thus see if the Linux driver
has this option or not):

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-networking/windows-81-dropping-wireless-connection/88ef2187-38f6-436b-bc25-e92cf6fe05af

I have a Motorola SURFboard SBG6580 that is 3-in-1: 1) cable modem, 2)
with 4 1Gb ports and 3) wireless AP. Works pretty well with a large
range of wireless equipments.

Bruce

On 8/13/2014 1:55 PM, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> AFA "did something," it was the Comcast tech who "did something" on
> his end. No Comcaster has seen or touched my machine.
>
> At this point I've noticed it simply seems to be a function of time: I
> wait, say, 15 minutes . . . and it suddenly works. All the while,
> though, the connection icon is lit, saying I'm good to go. But yeah,
> wait ten, fifteen and it works. Disconnect, reconnect, works immediately.
>
> Could someone suggest a wifi router that would be compatible with an
> Xfinity XB3? I tried my old Quest PK5000, but it's a DSL modem.
>
> LB
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Kirk Gleason <kgleason@gmail.com
> <mailto:kgleason@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Concur completely. But I did get that line from a technician. It
> *was* hard not to laugh in his face, but I did manage.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:48 AM, dosman <dosman@packetsniffers.org
> <mailto:dosman@packetsniffers.org>> wrote:
>
> Blanket statements like "your wifi is not as fast as our wifi"
> are laughable at best. There's no magic Comcast wifi protocol
> that works better. Anything any provider tells you over the
> phone needs to be taken with a grain of salt, they are just
> reading from a script. The only people I would trust are the
> technicians that show up at your door, and even then not all
> of those folks are as sharp as one would hope, but my personal
> experience with them has been very good (both AT&T and Comcast
> techs).
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Kirk Gleason wrote:
>
> > Also worth noting is that Comcast tries to do some things
> with their "free wifi-routers" that I find to be suspicious
> and you have to jump through a bunch of hoops to be able to
> run your own router -- you have to specifically request that
> they convert the provided router to a bridge. I've had some
> serious issues with the provided Comcast WiFi stuff (not just
> in Linux) and in every case, I've ended up disabling the wifi
> on the Comcast provided device, getting them to enable the
> bridge mode, and running my router.
> >
> > Comcast alleges that this slows down your wifi. Perhaps. I
> don't have a baseline to test against. I know that in my
> house, we are able to comfortably run 2 netflix streams and a
> hulu stream simultaneously.
> >
> > Are you using the router from Comcast? If so, do you have
> access to a different router?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Kevin Hunter Kesling
> <hunteke@gmail.com <mailto:hunteke@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > At 5:07pm -0400 Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> > I'm on U14.04 on my Thinkpad X201. I could not get Wifi to
> work at
> > all initially. Then a Xfinity support person "changed
> something" and
> > it . . . sort of worked.
> >
> > In context of the second sentence, it's not clear to me
> whether you are talking about the Xfinity hardware, or your
> laptop. Did the Xfinity support personality help you with
> Linux on your laptop? If so (and I gather from the other
> messages in this thread that they did), then I'm impressed, as
> I'm not aware of too many Linux support options for the
> desktop (okay, laptop) user.
> >
> > I'm also curious: you say they changed "something". How did
> they do this? Did you give them root access to your machine?
> >
> >
> > That means it worked after fiddling with enable, disable,
> (I'm on
> > Gnome classic). Actually, I don't know what I would do, but
> > eventually it would work.
> >
> > For debugging purposes, it's important to describe what you
> mean by "wouldn't work". Does the network just stop
> responding? For example, are you in the middle of downloading
> a web page which stops halfway through, and then you note that
> you can't do anything (open any other website in another tab,
> ping a google.com <http://google.com>, etc.)? Does the
> NetworkManager applet animate as if it's unable to connect to
> a network?
> >
> > In a later message, you pasted some lines from the syslog.
> I think some bits are missing from each session, which may be
> important for tracking down the issue. Nevertheless, I do
> note one difference:
> >
> > Bad session: NetworkManager[1525]: <info> Policy set
> >
> > 'HOME-2D4F-2.4' (wlan2) as default for IPv4 routing and
> DNS.
> >
> > Good session: NetworkManager[1525]: <info> Policy set
> >
> > 'HOME-2D4F-5' (wlan2) as default for IPv4 routing and DNS.
> >
> > Given just this difference, 2.4 vs 5, I wonder if there is a
> mismatch in either the Xfinity implementation of 802.11n
> ("Wireless N"), or -- more likely -- is the wireless N driver
> incomplete on your X201? In other words, given 802.11n, it is
> _not_ strange that it wants to use both frequencies (recall
> that 802.11n is a MIMO technology), but I wonder if the
> implementation is buggy. Specifically, I know that Intel
> wireless Linux drivers had, at one point, some issues with
> 802.11n. Do they still?
> >
> >
> > Then I'd put it in suspend, come back . . . and it wouldn't
> work.
> > Repeat fiddling, rebooting, etc., then it would work. Any
> ideas what
> > I'm having probs with?
> >
> > Notwithstanding my above question, this general behavior
> echoes experiences I've had with some wireless firmware and
> kernel modules. In the end, my solution was to remove the
> module, and reinsert it. Since your lshw output suggests you
> use iwlwifi as your wireless driver, here's the relevant
> action from the command line:
> >
> > $ sudo modprobe -r iwlwifi
> > $ sudo modprobe iwlwifi
> >
> > This is the moral equivalent of rebooting, but at the driver
> level. At this point, if it doesn't "just work", you should
> be able to restart NetworkManager (sudo service networkmanager
> restart). That simple trick has fixed 90% of my wireless
> "stopped working randomly or post-suspend" issues on Linux.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > BLUG mailing list
> > BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org <mailto:BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org>
> > http://lists.bloomingtonlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/blug
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kirk Gleason
> > _______________________________________________
> > BLUG mailing list
> > BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org <mailto:BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org>
> > http://lists.bloomingtonlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/blug
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org <mailto:BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org>
> http://lists.bloomingtonlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/blug
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Gleason
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org <mailto:BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org>
> http://lists.bloomingtonlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/blug
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLUG mailing list
> BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org
> http://lists.bloomingtonlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/blug

_______________________________________________
BLUG mailing list
BLUG@bloomingtonlinux.org
http://lists.bloomingtonlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/blug

No comments: